Join guest host, Emma Hinkle, and her guests—Steven Millerman, Alessandra Richardson, and Rajni Parthasarathy—as they delve into the nuances of multicultural considerations in medical communications. This episode stems from an interesting roundtable discussion at the Annual Meeting of ISMPP 2024, highlighting the importance of understanding cultural differences in medical publications. From defining multicultural considerations in the medical communications space to practical insights for improving diversity in clinical trials and medical communications, this episode offers actionable strategies and real-world examples.
Emma Hinkle is a Senior Medical Writer at MedThink SciCom, Alessandra Richardson is the Senior Manager of U.S. Medical Communications for Neurology and Immunology at EMD Serono, Steven Millerman is the General Manager of FingerPaint Group, and Rajni Parthasarathy is the VP of SCientific Services and DEI Lead at HCG.
Produced by ISMPP (International Society for Medical Publication Professionals), in partnership with Evergreen Podcasts. The views expressed in this recording are those of the individuals and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of ISMPP or the companies or institutions with which they are currently or past affiliated. This presentation is for informational purposes only and is not intended as legal or regulatory advice. Thank you for listening to InformED! Please subscribe to the show on your favorite podcast app and rate our show highly if you enjoyed it. ISMPP benefits medical publications and medical communications professionals by providing members with knowledge, community, and professionalism. Consider becoming a member! Visit ismpp.org.
[00:00:04] Hello and welcome to InformED, a podcast series where you will hear industry experts share their thought-provoking insights and lessons in the field of medical communications. This series is brought to you by ISMPP and is generously sponsored by MedTink Psychom. My name is Emma
[00:00:24] Hankel and I'm joined today by Stephen Millerman, Alessandra Richardson, and Rajne Parasarathi. The opinions shared here today are those of our own and do not necessarily reflect those of our employers. As for me, I am a senior medical writer at MedTink Psychom and I'm looking
[00:00:38] forward to moderating this important discussion. And with that, I will turn it over to our group to introduce themselves. Hi, my name is Alessandra Richardson and I am the senior manager of U.S. Medical Communications for Neurology and Immunology at EMD Serono. I'm excited to be here today.
[00:00:57] Hi everyone, my name is Steve Millerman. I am the general manager of FingerPain Group and specifically of our FingerPaint Multicultural Division. Nice to see everyone. Hello, everyone. I am Rajne Parasarathi, VP of Scientific Services and DEIB Lead here at
[00:01:16] the Healthcare Consultancy Group or HCG, which is a part of the Omnicom Health Group. It is wonderful to be here today. Thank you all for joining us. We are excited for this conversation. So just a little bit
[00:01:28] of background. At the ISMAP 2024 meeting about storytelling, there was a roundtable discussion about multicultural considerations, which was the impetus for this podcast. So Stephen, to start us off, can you define what multicultural considerations are and how these multicultural considerations can apply to medical communications specifically?
[00:01:48] Yeah, definitely. You know, it's an interesting topic in itself in context of medical communications because we typically think about multicultural audiences and multicultural communications in marketing and kind of brand communications and so on. But overall, whether it's
[00:02:07] in medical or in marketing or anywhere else, we're talking about cultural nuances. When we think about different cultures, whether it's the US Hispanic group, African American group, different Asian subgroups and so on, we're looking at insights that are specific cultural
[00:02:23] differences and just having an awareness of what those differences are. What's interesting is those cultural nuances are not necessarily clinical in nature. So when we think about defining what that is, a lot of the times it's a little bit more behavioral, psychographics.
[00:02:40] They're a little bit more psychological. And these are nuances that could be driven by cultural backgrounds. It could be driven by generational perceptions from one culture that's being passed on from one generation to the next. So these are cultural perspectives.
[00:02:56] The reason why it's sort of important in context of medical communications and defining this in context of medical communications is ultimately we want physicians to make better connections with their patients. And sort of the final outcome is the patient following the doctor's orders.
[00:03:15] Maybe that's a good way to put it. And if the HCP is not necessarily considering, whereas aware of some of those cultural nuances, that the orders may not be followed to that granular degree that the HCP is looking for. So whether that's taking place
[00:03:32] at the diagnosis level or at the treatment level of why a patient of a certain culture may be diagnosed a little bit later or get on a certain treatment or not get on a certain treatment,
[00:03:45] those are all related back at times to some of the cultural nuances. And that's what we mean by incorporation of those cultural nuances in medical communications. Yeah. Thank you for that definition. That's really helpful and give some background to
[00:04:00] this conversation we're going to have. So Alessandra, from our group discussion at ISMAP during the roundtable which you are a part of, what did we learn and what would you say are the focus areas for multicultural considerations both within medical communications overall
[00:04:14] as well as in industry, which is where you are currently? Well, we definitely had a robust discussion at ISMAP 2024. It was clear that this is a topic that many people are passionate about. And so some key takeaways that we got from
[00:04:26] this discussion included first, that medical publication professionals should take the time to understand cultural differences. Second, once you recognize these cultural nuances, it is important to be inclusive and collaborative pulling in a diverse working team on any project.
[00:04:40] And last, we strive to be adaptable and sensitive. Remember, these are medical conditions we're working with and we should maintain sensitivity with HCPs and patients from diverse backgrounds. And then as a group together, we came up with some specific recommendations from an ISMAP perspective.
[00:04:55] First, it's important on any project to involve diverse groups. A phrase that I kept hearing throughout the meeting was nothing about us without us. And I think that's a really great way to encapsulate how multicultural thinking should first involve inclusivity of
[00:05:09] diverse populations of patients, HCPs and Medcoms professionals. And then recognize the importance of cultural differences and nuances that can inform how medical information is communicated. And then lastly, ISMAP has the opportunity to create educational content like this podcast or like articles that highlight the importance and value of
[00:05:27] developing a plan that incorporates multicultural considerations, but also has practical applications or case studies that bring it to life. Thank you for sharing that. Yeah, it's really great that there are some actionable recommendations coming out of the
[00:05:40] roundtable that we were a part of. So Rajni, at ISMAP 2024, you presented a poster titled, Inclusivity in Action, HCP Perspectives on Diversifying Clinical Trials. Can you explain how you decided to conduct this research, what you found and how
[00:05:55] this research ties into multicultural considerations? Sure. So there are certain communities that often face a higher burden of diseases such as diabetes or autoimmune diseases, etc. And they are still frequently underrepresented in clinical trials. The very research that
[00:06:13] could actually lead to better treatments. And this could actually have serious consequences such as less effective treatments, compounded health disparities, wasted resources, increased economic burden, everything ultimately leading to poorer quality of care. So we thought about
[00:06:30] what is being done to address this. The FDA has come up with guidance encouraging sponsors to diversify their trials and pharma companies are actively engaged in this and creating resources to reach out to minority communities. But the effectiveness of these efforts is still
[00:06:46] quite unclear. And that is where our research came in to assess how we as Metcoms professionals can work together in maximizing these efforts. So we surveyed US based HCPs that are actively involved in clinical trials through CERMO and received responses from over 50 HCPs across
[00:07:04] a wide spectrum of specialties. And the key learnings were that while HCPs acknowledge the ongoing efforts, there still exist significant barriers to diverse trial recruitment such as a lack of awareness and mistrust of healthcare systems. Now these HCPs indicated that the most
[00:07:22] impactful efforts would be to empower HCPs by providing them with the right tools and the right information that they need to reach out to a wider range of potential participants, which I think is very valuable for us to know and be to develop patient centric protocols
[00:07:39] and patient friendly resources to make the trials more appealing and accessible to participants from diverse background, which is very much in line with what I've come across in my experience as well. There was an instance where a patient advocacy group said that patients prefer we talk
[00:07:54] to them rather than talking at them, which I think was quite eye opening. And in terms of resources, the most preferred ones that emerged from the survey included digital tools for investigators and study site coordinators, use of AI for patient recruitment, and training on
[00:08:10] cultural awareness and sensitivity to enhance diversity in clinical trials, which is very much in line with what Steve alluded to in the beginning. And to ensure wider culturally appropriate outreach, we need to utilize the right channels that resonate with our target
[00:08:25] audiences such as ethnic or local newspapers, local TV or radio channels, or even the right social media platforms that are popular in specific communities and countries. That is all so fantastic. And I think it's incredible that you were able to pull so much
[00:08:41] information out of those surveys, especially because we hear all the time of we need more diversity in clinical trials. So actually have some actionable insights for that is incredible. So this next question is for all three of you to answer. So based on your
[00:08:53] experience, what would you say are the practical considerations for incorporating multicultural elements in medical affairs? And Rajne, would you mind kicking us off answering this question just based on the research from your poster as well as your
[00:09:06] experience and agency? Absolutely. And it's you hit the right spot by saying we need actionable insights. It's so critical that we conduct the right market research and collect the right data and understand the specific needs and preferences and cultural
[00:09:24] nuances of these target patient populations to then help inform how we can communicate the right messages to different audiences. And that includes consideration of multiple factors, be it language, be it health beliefs, traditional beliefs, access to healthcare, etc, etc.
[00:09:40] And based on the identified gaps from this market research, providing the right cultural competency training to address any unconscious bias. Now one example that comes to mind based on my personal experiences and professional experiences is how even communication styles
[00:09:56] vary across cultures. How in some places a very strong emphasis on respecting authority figures and social hierarchy in general can affect how the communication style could be more formal and indirect. So the way you convey a message needs to be altered and tailored accordingly.
[00:10:15] Another key factor is considering cultural beliefs to ensure our messages sensitive while being informative. Like there are certain cultural practices that are so deeply rooted in traditions and beliefs that belittling them or condemning them to convey some kind of a medical
[00:10:32] piece of information might actually backfire. And some examples that come to mind again, based on experience are food and dietary practices and fasting among different cultures, traditional healing practices or even traditions such as consanguinous marriages in some cultures
[00:10:48] which can significantly raise the risk of genetic diseases. So instead of condemnation, the right strategy should be to collaborate and to co-create culturally appropriate resources wherever possible. We basically need an approach that fosters understanding and empowers
[00:11:05] communities to make informed choices more than anything else. And lastly, I would like to say that engagement is a two-way street. So it's absolutely critical to partner with diverse patient advocacy groups or establish diverse patient advisory boards that can then
[00:11:20] allow us to gain valuable insights directly from the communities of interest and their feedback can then help refine our communication strategies and materials. So expanding accessibility of culturally sensitive materials is absolutely key. Yeah, I loved your emphasis on just the
[00:11:37] collaboration point and making sure that patients and the HCPs are collaborating across to make sure that they're understood together and it's in really important work. So Alessandra, for on the industry side of publications, how would you say that multicultural considerations
[00:11:53] are being discussed and incorporated? I know Rajni had mentioned some about like the right message at the right time. Yeah, so from what I have observed at EMD Serona, we're taking a multi-pronged approach to bring diverse perspectives to the table. So on the HCP side,
[00:12:07] we support health disparity fellowships in oncology and neurology that support research within the field of health disparity under those therapeutic areas and then supporting those fellows themselves so amplifying their research and helping them along their career
[00:12:21] journey to get networking access and continue their research beyond the fellowship period. And then in terms of advisory boards, we're keeping diversity in mind throughout. So this includes diversity of geography, age, ethnicity, race and gender. This is always a topic whenever
[00:12:37] we're discussing inviting advisors to an advisory board. And then on the flip side from the patient perspective, my department head actually, Marie-Ange is working on piloting an initiative called My Health in Motion. So basically this would be kind of a shipping container full of
[00:12:51] patient centric above brand health materials that will travel around the country to communities with predominantly Black or Hispanic populations and will be partnering with local community organizations and patient advocacy groups to host events around these tour
[00:13:03] stops. So sharing information with patients, also understanding what are those factors in their treatment journey that are most important to them because you really don't know until you ask the questions. And so really trying to continue that dialogue and make it more of a
[00:13:20] collaborative effort like Rajni said rather than just talking at people. That initiative sounds great. And I'm very interested to hear how that goes. And it seems like it's definitely meeting a need in these communities, which is fantastic. So Steven, pivoting back to the agency
[00:13:34] side, how can multicultural considerations be folded into educational elements? Sort of what Alessandro has mentioned a little bit. And can you provide us an example of what this could look like within medical communications? Yeah, certainly. And I think we touched upon a
[00:13:49] little bit in some of the other questions as well. You know, when we think about any types of communications, it ultimately comes down to content and the platforms and the channels that are being used. Right? And at the end of the day, content is king for this particular
[00:14:05] topic because we're ultimately again looking to address insights, cultural insights that are being driven for years from one generation to the next, even amongst some of the younger generations that are seeing physicians just at the same rate. And so when we think about
[00:14:24] the platforms that are available, they're pretty traditional platforms. And so when we think about everything from simple HCP medical websites, content could easily be dispersed throughout simple websites that everyone is doing down to investigative meetings, for example, or
[00:14:43] conferences. So for instance, Rajni was talking about clinical trials. When we roll out clinical trials, there's always training that takes place with investigators. There's meetings that takes place with investigators. That is a perfect platform and a perfect example where
[00:14:58] that content, those cultural nuances could be addressed during the enrollment phase of the trial just as much as they could be addressed during the ongoing trial. Make sure people are not dropping out of the trials because some of those reasons and some of these insights
[00:15:12] could also be driving some of those behaviors for patients as well. Those are cultural behaviors. But ultimately, the content could be delivered in any platforms. Another great example is just simple speaker programs that probably every one of us has done when we develop decks and
[00:15:28] there's speakers and KOLs. All of those programs could also be developed content that is specifically addressing those key nuances. But I think one of the key elements is a lot of the times not just understanding what it is and doing the research to understand what the insights are,
[00:15:46] but also frankly disproving and debunking some of the perceptions that may exist in the industry on some of the cultural nuances that have been talked about for years, for decades, but they may or may no longer be true. That is a critical element that I think Rajni
[00:16:03] also mentioned about research and understanding cultural competency. There are certain elements and a perfect example is trust gets discussed a lot because you're looking to build trust between a physician and the patient. But a lot of the times trust may or may not be the issue.
[00:16:18] It could just be simple disconnects in a conversation where the doctor, by understanding some of those nuances, will actually have a better connection with the patient. But it may not necessarily be trust, which is a different challenge. And so sometimes it's not just
[00:16:34] what it is, but also what it isn't. But some of those examples could be delivered through the content of understanding those key nuances. Again, whether it's an investigator meeting, publication, a conference, a website or a speaker program.
[00:16:47] Yeah, this gives a lot of food for thought just all of these different elements that need to be considered. I want to thank you all for your insights. This has been a great conversation and I think it will open up a lot more conversations within the ISMAP community.
[00:17:00] Thanks for listening to Informed for medical communication professionals. Please take a minute to subscribe to the show on your favorite podcast app, inform your colleagues and rate our show highly if you liked what you heard today. Join ISMAP today to become a part of our community,
[00:17:15] to participate in our webinars and to receive instant access to exclusive tools and resources. If you're interested just go to ISMAP.org that's ISMPP.org to learn more. And I'm Emma Hinkle.

